What a great end to 2006! Not only did Waiting for Your Cat to Bark? Persuading Customers When They Ignore Marketing reach #1 on the Wall Street Journal list, as well as charting big on the New York Times, USA Today, BusinessWeek, and Amazon bestsellers lists, but now Advertising Age is chiming in with a meowing high-five.
Should auld acquaintance be forgot? We're still not sure if that's rhetorical. One thing's certain, though: if 2007 shapes up any better than this year, we'll be entirely bored with congratulating Lisa T. Davis and Bryan & Jeffrey Eisenberg for their fantastic work.
So, for those who haven't gotten around to reading the book, what are you waiting for?
10
books you should have read
18
December 2006
(c)
2006 Crain Communications, Inc. All rights reserved.
1.
Rex Briggs and Greg Stuart: "What Sticks: Why Most Advertising Fails and
How to Guarantee Yours Succeeds" (Kaplan Business)
Uses
data from experiments by real marketers to cut through the doomsday hype and
cynical opportunism that surround the slow death of conventional advertising.
2. Charles Hughes and William Jeanes: "Branding Iron: Branding Lessons from the Meltdown of the U.S. Auto Industry" (Racom Books)
4.
Jeffrey Pfeffer and Robert I. Sutton: "Hard Facts, Dangerous Half-Truths
and Total Nonsense: Profiting From Evidence-Based Management"
Breaks
down tools such as consumer-generated media and word-of-mouth marketing to help
marketers reach today's aloof, independent customer.
How
advances in technology "empower ordinary people to beat big media, big
government and other goliaths." Podcasts and blogs are the least of your
worries.
Unlike
many advertising books, this is smartly written and fun to read. But it must be
said that the "aha" moments are evened out by the number of
businesses no longer making juice with Fallon.
10.
Fred Reichheld: "The Ultimate Question" (Harvard Business School Press)
Reduces
customer-loyalty quandaries to a breathtakingly simple question: "Would
you recommend us to a friend?" Of course, after that, things get more
complicated after that.